Re: ka'e (was: Re: [lojban] Introduction, and zutse/se sutse

[And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>]

>>> Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org> 11/14/01 05:39pm >>>
#On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:
#> >>> Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org> 11/14/01 05:21pm >>>
#> #On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:
#> #> 2. The "innately capable of" is open to the objection raised by Jorge--
#> #> that it wrongly privileges one sumti.
#> #
#> #Not so fast. Which sumti is wrongly privileged in "ka'e klama da"?
#>
#> The goer. I assume on the basis of canonical examples that it is the
#> goer that is innately capable of going somewhere.
#
#.ienai .i le selkla po'o cu selsnu 

Not really. Ignoring the ka'e, your sentence says "you-know-what
goes somewhere from you-know-where via you-know-where...".

#.i ku'i le mulno ckini cu cumki
#.i ko lanli "mi pu klama" .i le mulno ckini cu purci

This is correct. ka'e should be similar, hence the objection to
"innately capable".

--And.