[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
From: Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:07:28 -0700 (MST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0112010035240.11480-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>

On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Invent Yourself wrote:

> Typically "lo'i ratcu" means {the set of rats}. In this case it means {the
> cardinality of the set of rats}.

Why?

lo'i ratcu cu barda -cardinality zo'e

barda's x2 seems to solve this problem. What is unsatisfactory about it?

(And of course cardinality can be taken care of by "zo'e")

- Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

References:
- Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
Next by Date: fa'u
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
Next by thread: fa'u
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread