[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Binary Language



In a message dated 12/24/2001 6:54:57 PM Central Standard Time, thinkit8@lycos.com writes:


As I said, "between" would be a one argument verb.  Try A between
(tag) B has location (tag) C has location.  Since tags aren't
ordered anyway, this makes sense.


Well, I don't see in what sense a one-place predicate can mean "between"  Since the sentence will only be true -- even meaningfull -- if it has the two "tags,"  this seems to be merely a remarkably inefficient way to show a three-place predicate.  I could, using this logic, make all predicates one-place by divvying up bits of the meaning in pieces and then requiring that all the "tags" be there with the "basic meaning" part.  I don't see that as in any way informative, merely arbitrarily procrustean.  The limit to two-place is in princple the same.  More coherent would be just areas and and (one-place) tags: entitlement donor recipient patient, for "give" say.  st least each piece really means something that way (the one-place "between" doe not have any meaning without  the tags).