In a message dated 2/13/2002 7:27:50 AM Central Standard Time, arosta@uclan.ac.uk writes:I think this is a problematic proposal, but it's going to look like nonsense I'm painfully aware it is a novel rule of interpretation. But it is offered as flowing naturally from given rules and as being needed. My point is that neither of these claims is true in any obvious sense or in any that xorxes (and your today remarks) has succeeded in presenting. |