Re: [lojban] go'i: repeated referents or just sumti?

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 2/26/2002 1:19:39 PM Central Standard Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:

(Strictly speaking, the sumti are the referents, but you
follow the usual tradition we have here of misusing 'sumti'
to refer to the words rather than to the arguments themselves.)

Is this strictly speaking?  The Book and the lists are ambiguous, without being explicit either way.  I take it that we need specifications to be totally clear about all the technical terms, though I think they were all intended to be about words, not things.