[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies



In a message dated 3/1/2002 2:56:38 PM Central Standard Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:


>But is a mass of text a text?

Some masses of texts, sure. Maybe even all masses, can you
think of a case where it wouldn't be?


I would like to see an example.  The mass of texts in my library is not obviously a text.  What does it collaborate to do or have done to it that clearly marks it as a text?

<>A mass of dogs is not a dog.

Almost always not. A mass of one dog is a dog.
No set of dogs is a dog.>

Well, I agree to the second part and can at least make sense of the first part, though I think that the mass of a single dog is different from the dog itself -- and certainly from any other dog, so not a dog at all.

<A is to abu as 1 is to pa.>

Since that seems to be the question I'm asking, how are these critters related, this hardly helps any.  I can can do circles on my own -- but can you all break out of yours?

<>This seems to add a new wrinkle to an already confusing (if
>not confused) situation, since capital letters have different letteral
>words.

Yes, but who uses those strange shifted letteral words? What
are they for?>

Well, you seem to use them in preference to the lower case ones at this point, for one thing.  You just don't refer to them correctly.