In a message dated 3/1/2002 8:00:49 PM Central Standard Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:
, the {lo broda}, which is {lo ro broda} could work
>sometimes even if there were no brodas (I forget what that was supposed to
>help with or be aproblem for).
I just want to point out that I never said that. {lo broda} is
{su'o lo ro broda} and of course it has existential import, from
{su'o}, not from {ro}.
What I said is that every set has ro members, and this includes
the empty set if ro can be zero.
Sorry I misremembered the exact way you put it; the problem with your claim remains, however.
|