Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 3/2/2002 8:51:08 AM Central Standard Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:

la pycyn cusku di'e

> > What I said is that every set has ro members, and this includes
> > the empty set if ro can be zero.
>
>Sorry I misremembered the exact way you put it; the problem with your claim
>remains, however.

What is the problem with my claim? You didn't say.

What you actually said was
<"all of all" does not add information, on the contrary, it loses
information, at least if you agree with me that "all" does not
have existential import.>
which I take as an unequivocal claim that {ro} does not entail {su'o} in at least some contexts.  This goes against basic logic and original Lojban -- see the first paragraph of the root message of this thread.