In a message dated 3/3/2002 10:43:46 AM Central Standard Time, rob@twcny.rr.com writes:And you wouldn't want {abu ly ibu cy ebu} to evaluate, so you'd put a No, I wouldn't, because all the examples I have (the Refgram, 17.2.1, 2) do without the {me'o}. You can say that spelling is a special context or you can say that the Refgram screwed this up worse, but it still does it this way and I would follow it. <A lerfu or lerfu string on its own is a pronoun. Always. > No, {a} is a sumti conjunction, {ai} is in UI, {n} is not a Lojban > _expression_. You're having fun mixing up levels, aren't you? Fine: any string of BY, including (any selma'o)+BU, which appears outside of mekso, is a pronoun, and so it refers to the referent of the pronoun. Do you agree with this?> No level mixing, just the issue of what refers to what -- that is use-mention confusion on a general level. But, yes, it is fun to catch someone in it. I do almost agree with what you say, except for spelling and 17.2.3 (and the implications of 17.10.6) |