Re: [lojban] Whorf Hypothesis in Scientific American

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:20:58PM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> > http://www.scientificamerican.com/explorations/2002/032502language/
> > 
> > The SA article in turn points to
> > 
> > http://www.sunflower.com/~dewatson/alford.htm
> > 
> > which has an extensive set of papers that are pro-Whorfian hypothesis. I 
> > haven't had time to read these though.
> > 
> > lojbab
> 
> The author of those papers has always struck me as a massive loony.
> A massive New Age loony. (Loony, not fool.)

By 'loony' you mean 'clinically insane'?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/