[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] cipja'o



In a message dated 4/27/2002 8:59:56 AM Central Daylight Time, gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes:


da'i seems good for hypothesis. how about this (for the deductive pattern I
used) ?

.i broda .inaja brodu
.i brode .inaja brodu
.ibrode .ija broda
.ida'i broda
.i brodu da'inai
da'i brode
.i brodu da'inai
.i brodu


OK.  I would put it as


.ibrode .ija broda
.i da'i broda
.i brodu da'inai
.i broda .inaja brodu
.i da'i brode
.i brodu da'inai
.i brode .inaja brodu
.i brodu

And the two conditonals could be eliminated (separation of cases rather than dilemma with conditional proofs)