[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Why is this ungrammatical?
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Why is this ungrammatical?
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:25:51 -0300
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eYqvRKIQjXXsD0cEFvPuPmzD8vmQY+jME/ZOVDRkOvcPEdlZKnOIS3+bSX2z8E5ewY+19jQ2NUSUqXVQZlfZLInrr+hEAwKBiKMZ+LHeYvk+NnhrCl1ROAPBTkitkMAPpTGS0BVNmF8soCfMXkxYNsxncY0IWIQ4bjfvBKbD9I8=
- In-reply-to: <777938058.20060201155929@mail.ru>
- References: <777938058.20060201155929@mail.ru>
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
On 2/1/06, Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:
> *roda rode zo'u lonu da gasnu lonu de morsi kei kei du lonu da catra de
> (If X acts so that Y is dead, that is the same thing as X kills Y)
>
> jbofi'e spits at this. Why?
A prenex has to be followed by a bridi, and there is no bridi there.
Replace {kei kei} with {cu} and it should work.
{lo (nu da gasnu lo (nu de morsi kei) kei) du} is a sumti.
mi'e xorxes