Re: [lojban] Re: semantic primes

[John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>]

--- Alex Joseph Martini <alexjm@umich.edu> wrote:

> This sounds to me like an excellent idea. In
> any case, it would greatly
> improve the clarity of the definitions. (See
> the discussion of {pritu}
> in lojban-beginners for an example of such
> confusion.) The majority of
> definitions (that I've looked at) on jbovlaste
> are currently written in
> a highly compressed style, typical of paper
> dictionaries that just don't
> have the space for longer entries.
> 

I can't find that discussion (didn't the lists
used to have a Search that looked at content, not
just subject lines, or am I thinking of another
list altogether?).  I assume the problem is with
{pritu3}, the frame of reference, since I can't
imagine a problem with 1 or 2 ("right" is not an
NSM prime but I sure don't see off-hand how to
specify it in simpler terms).  What was the issue
and how was it resolved (or can you give me a
Subject line to get into the thread)?