Re: [lojban] Re: semantic primes

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 3/20/06, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >    le bolci cu drani le tricu lo catlu be le
> > cmana
>
> {pritu} not {drani}, i.e., wrong right.

Oops!! :)

> But this
> does not solve the problem since it is either
> false or nonsense in the situation described:
> there is not, ex hypothesi, such a thing as lo
> catlu be le cmana.

I pass from getting drawn into a {lo} thread again,
thank you. We already know we disagree about that.

mu'o mi'e xorxes