Re: [lojban] Re: Suggestions for jboselkei

[Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net>]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Matt Arnold wrote:

> > > 3) Computing proficiency in Lojban as: selecting only those 
> > > translations from the set of the translations made by the user that 
> > > were reviewed by at least three reviewers, then find an average 
> > > value of these translations.

> > Not very good. The good stimulus is to recive rating shortly after 
> > work is done, and this suggestion makes waiting for revard too long.

> I am not sure that I agree, Cyril. It might be a worthwhile trade-off. 
> The more meaningful the rating is, the more incentive it is.

> Yanis, how long of a wait would it be? Considering that computers work 
> quite fast, perhaps it would be only a matter of minutes at most. 
> Psychologically, that would still be a stimulus.

The problem is not a computer speed, but a human speed. We need to 
recive three reviews from three different reviewers to calculate average 
value, and this can take long time.


--
Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net>