[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Is this correct?
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Is this correct?
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:25:08 -0300
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gF9O95iS08gfVJ7AY9dV6QM6iqW/LP3yuRtmXn50BwgHNPXsg5FtWQwOPAdbyDZ48tlTyw7doHrrrb/2udIsrVqZ9ABx9/qg7QF2k3plCBBUK4u3vfbtiI65C8H17zTkWjXkDTVoamQfrng7OJTiiQv/R9bnmaMDhHXTTmXiesc=
- In-reply-to: <6875994.20060412155835@mail.ru>
- References: <6875994.20060412155835@mail.ru>
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
On 4/12/06, Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:
> ni'o la pitr. djeksyn. no'u la'o gy. Peter Jackson .gy. goi ko'a cu misno ke merko kinzbapre
> .i ko'a ba'o zbasu lo'i skina noi la'o gy. The Lord of the Rings .gy. traji lo ka misno kei fo ke'a
>
> My question is, is such usage of {noi ... ke'a ...} correct in the
> sense of "created a set of films, the most famous of which is the Lord
> of the Rings" ?
Strictly speaking, he created the films, not the logical set of films. Given
the films, the logical set of them automatically exists without anyone's
intervention. Logical sets are not made. That's why I don't use {lo'i}, it is
not really a pluralizer nor a group maker. Probably {lo'i} will end up as a
simple plural marker though, given how hard it is to use it as a logical set.
mu'o mi'e xorxes