Re: [lojban] {.i} in dialogues

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] {.i} in dialogues
From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:11:44 -0300
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eUomk2nBciB+IKyjQaMkVwnoy19KNQ5idWcw0BaJWQJ72Ubc5sPZttnIlGq+IjdCOLdKE0Cldgor7UmVw5kjRRHDJITwd8i+YQ5VwXCMgdLocXAP8WgUggbzAxmHBfflzSYqF7QCFKpfIGj2eAw2Wex8rXfdpu1ZJqrUtRov1Rw=
In-reply-to: <642247766.20060512061803@mail.ru>
References: <642247766.20060512061803@mail.ru>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>

On 5/11/06, Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:


In a dialogue, is {.i} required for the first bridi of B when A has just
said something?


No. It's allowed, but not required. (I think CLL mentions that.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: {.i} in dialogues
  - From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>

References:
- {.i} in dialogues
  - From: Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru>