[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] furry species?




On May 12, 2006, at 8:04 AM, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote:

In a message dated 5/12/2006 4:22:03 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


> As a separate thing, yes. But a kind of bear as bear has to go in x1.
> For example, I don't think you can say:
>
>   ro se cribe cu se gacri lo kerfa
>   Every species of bear (as a species) is covered by fur.
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>

Why not? It seems to parse just fine to me.

mu'omi'e .aleks.


Bears have fur.  Species don't have fur.

stevo

.ui.ua So this falls in the category of grammatical nonsense, then.

mu'omi'e .aleks.