coi bil.I can't say so for certain, but it seems quite likely that it does. I can't think of any grammatical parts that don't break up into two smaller pieces eventually leading to a specifier/adjunct/complement plus a head.
Based, of course, on my limited understanding of the theory from Wikipedia and some knowledge of grammar. My other clue is in the formal definitions of the language. I can't seem to find the original website it's from anymore anymore, but the dictionary I have lists out what parts combine how in a structure that could be pretty easily broken down into a tree. I can email out the PDF if anyone's interested. CLL has a grammar that's more formal and quite a bit less readable.
http://www.xahlee.org/lojban/hrefgram/chapter21.html mu'omi'e .aleks. On May 15, 2006, at 6:27 PM, bill@thebranchhearth.net wrote:
Hello All,Does anyone know if the Lojban grammar is consistent with the X-bar theoryput forth by Chomsky.As far as we know, all natural languages are consistent with X-bar at thedeep structure level. Regards, Bill