Re: [lojban] Re: Strategery

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Strategery
From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:02:56 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Yay5Y5WuMgnGk9i8msJwJKuJ2Ro/Pqf8SyfkOtTQKQFeJTzRWsAvXVuWcjAT1aEEjxmnte9PLvULJ5yLKEnPE9XBWW1rgDBp9Kvwz6PJX8lMiYUxDrndx9iScgimWSf8EfOlzKWw5+c4dG1oGL2hI3uUkxVgRARlv4+rsegoAPY=
In-reply-to: <ec8285e60605180123r545a4ffeh4501e249f18e0d83@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1253926060.20060518133021@mail.ru> <ec8285e60605180123r545a4ffeh4501e249f18e0d83@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>

{bilni selzukte selplatu}, "military typeof action typeof plan"?

Being "military" is not a general feature of tactics or strategy.

You can talk about one's strategy in chess, for example, but

really different sports may include these plans... such as tennis.

mi'e.darves.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: Strategery
  - From: "Matt Arnold" <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>

References:
- Strategery
  - From: Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru>
- Re: [lojban] Strategery
  - From: "Maxim Katcharov" <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com>