I'm having trouble with:
lo ro mapku cu melbi gi'e ku'i du'e mei do'e lo nu mi bevri
I'm not well versed enough with {du'emei/do'e}, but here's my
understanding of it:
[lo ro mapku]* [cu melbi] gi'e ku'i []* [du'emei] [do'e lo nu mi bevri]
so {lo ro mapku} is melbi and du'emei...
du'emei = x1 is a set with too many members x2
x1 being {lo ro mapku}
x3 that is added being {do'e lo nu mi bevri}, which seems to be {bevri
pe numi} "a carrier related to the event of me".
am I confused? Yes.
On 5/22/06, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/22/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I may be a bit confused - why doesn't
>
> ro lo mapku cu melbi gi'e ku'i du'e mei do'e lo nu mi bevri
>
> work here?
Because it says that each hat was too many for me to carry.
> This seems to be the problem of masses that John described much
> earlier, how you couldn't really say "all the students surrounded the
> building and wore hats".
You couldn't say it with outer {ro}, right.