[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: ambiguity in lojban

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ambiguity in lojban
From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:24:13 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eRNSU9BjflKuB5o7W2vYgYLGVkA7XSwpnKKzfc5rY1jc1E255rB4Rb1wQDoT5hpTGzJy8Pgx4h3SsKy86OO3UOsMQp1F8CKh6PPS2I2yZ7V7870IWXQ2owx8VH560gSVdMKJz6g1omQoPWSThY3CbB6TtCL0L8YPSGn6594yf2s=
In-reply-to: <1944521421.20060621113235@mail.ru>
References: <737b61f30606202005v6737ce2cw7f779ba5e102c579@mail.gmail.com> <1944521421.20060621113235@mail.ru>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>

On 6/20/06, Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:

I think no one has ever pretended that Lojban can 10 times ease the
understanding of the language by a machine.


I think some of the older texts did imply that Lojban would be a *big*
help in machine language comprehension. I haven't seen anyone really
advocate this recently, though. I bet it's been many years since this
position has really been plausible--maybe in the early 90s it was much
more defensible. But I wanted to throw it in there anyway. :-)

Chris Capel
--
"What is it like to be a bat? What is it like to bat a bee? What is it
like to be a bee being batted? What is it like to be a batted bee?"
-- The Mind's I (Hofstadter, Dennet)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: ambiguity in lojban
  - From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>

References:
- ambiguity in lojban
  - From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] ambiguity in lojban
  - From: Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] ambiguity in lojban
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: ambiguity in lojban
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] ambiguity in lojban
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: ambiguity in lojban
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread