On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:41 AM, Paul Vigo wrote:
> With
> lojban I think this may be particularly useful as many of the gismu
> are complex (place structure variations can make a familiar seeming
> word suddenly novel again) and many look pretty much the same
> (cvccv / ccvcv) so are easy to confuse with other gismu when
> unfamiliar.
On the topic of gismu looking simmilar, how much work would be
involved in making a list of gismu that only differ by vowels? I've
found a few pairs like {ciska} and {cusku} that I repeatedly have to
look up to keep apart, but I'm not sure how many there are total.