Re: [lojban] Re: plural markers?

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: plural markers?
From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:32:32 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=KYLvvKRXHvNp+MRtZh/BNVZzvWoMU0Uho0VcVw9sc9J357LliB2+bL6I1wxRmVRFIMI3aFI4kltw+I1VTE0LMNLcb90VJUIQYe91fqlQ2umildhMhZrkie/Ctl7hEyCvZConvYcUQX1LDfE9Z1R458C8+6FuwfCiz1L7Gq834/I=
In-reply-to: <20060627203557.86802.qmail@web81315.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <737b61f30606270732o2cf31bf1y3fc813a88377791f@mail.gmail.com> <20060627203557.86802.qmail@web81315.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>

> So -- context permitting -- the best plural is just the form without internal quantifiers at all.

mi cusku lo mintu be di'u

mi'e darves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: plural markers?
  - From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>

References:
- Re: [lojban] Re: plural markers?
  - From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: plural markers?
  - From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>