Re: [lojban] Re: plural markers?

[HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>]

> I took it as {ta'e} or some such, since I couldn't
> find it either.

 

"Although in most of the cases the lack of this {su'o re}

doesn't lead to ambiguity."

(...because it excludes only one case, if we're talking

about integer quantities.)
 

> Maybe he has just come to this point of view.

 

It is a characteristic of the language, so I couldn't

come to another one. :)

 

mi'e darves