Matt Arnold wrote:
... [much cutting because I agree with it all ... except ...] In all of these areas, you just have to stop and say "good enough" or you'll never have any improvements that people will agree on and adopt.
I agree that there are times when you have to stop and say "good enough". I counter that there are times where old issues can and should be revisited for the purposes of "better". It's the only way to get innovation on top of innovation. It's the only way to stand on the shoulders of giants.
Do you think this is the wrong time to revisit this issue? You may well be right, and you probably know better than me. What makes this a wrong time? When would a right time be?
mi'e .xius. --