[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: ZOI and culture neutrality
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ZOI and culture neutrality
- From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kp1280Zh8YO6Ba+KWxVbtaXUy4G/C14SA7ZTSFYb5OdxJDSwQF/dzlMZHylhSfXDmO2284A4E6Qy9Pk6s5zpDFwAk81N/+/H6KtvkLtnaql8iFth0d5SWORNsf+SvaqqijflY1fWp0+AadP0Px9quTZ+oKAP6UYBExYfgpg5nxo= ;
- In-reply-to: <44B09643.5010005@gmail.com>
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
Sorry, I took you as saying it ought to be done (what improvements usually entail). this was a
request -- in that light -- to show where the need lay, i.e., in what sense its inclusion would be
an improvement on something.
--- Hugh O'Byrne <hobyrne@gmail.com> wrote:
> John E Clifford wrote:
> > ... I don't see the need for it.
>
> In the argument (summarized)
>
> me: I think something could be improved!
> you: I don't see the need for it.
>
> your point is at best value-neutral (not even value-negative). I would
> ask you not to filibuster.
>
> --
> Good night, and have a rational tomorrow!
>
> mi'e .xius.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
> you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.
>
>