Re: [lojban] Re: A (rather long) discussion of {all}

[John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>]

I guess I don't see why d-truth implies c-truth; that was certainly not the intentio.  Where did I
slip up?

--- Jorge Llamb�as <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/19/06, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > Interesting.  I haven't thought about what to do with numerical quantifiers yet -- they don't
> > arise for the present problem, which is just singular vs. plural.
> 
> I didn't really mean to bring in numerical quantifiers in any significant way.
> Remove them and the same question arises: "the boys carried the chairs
> to the garden" cannot be split into only two cases, d and c, to evaluate its
> truth. (Or if it can, then d-true would always entail c-true, so
> defining "true"
> as distinct from "c-true" would seem pointless.)
> 
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
> you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.
> 
>