Re: [lojban] "berulium"

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] "berulium"
From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:18:18 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DAZV153ajfLgGNK/1l9Jv/ipMkc8vPgLxEUSPJEk/F78dr10lBS5x54fp/D6mM0PuJmzWdrjDJZantMg7KZbGMIAF87bNqWA18XZht4XywBnAoYGDjTe9iJbq4CkD/uHOJw2Sz7K9cvjWZBE6ij/SrFD+RDhYBPhf6zQAe3ZxT0=
In-reply-to: <237341249.20060819153832@mail.ru>
References: <237341249.20060819153832@mail.ru>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>

I wonder whether {boronium}, {berulium} and {elium}} are valid after {lo}.

They're names, so they cannot be. o_O

I don't have any idea why Bobas used {lo}.

mi'e.darves