[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: livejournal discrimination
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: livejournal discrimination
- From: Nathaniel Krause <nathanielkrause@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:34:06 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jufQq/avECMV6YgdaLD0bABfBAzIHkRAbn1hs+jnobVrg4sTkWNpozQ5H08oGRM+M9fEVHbHgNCR+tzdpbUg3WmiNGrp52wdce/ufe8z3u+R++6RbWF3wWMgVOSC+QmWwpyMsXe93I72kpHE1SKUxtH1J4MRMNCbYfwwf9OMXp8= ;
- In-reply-to: <878xioqtu4.fsf@gmail.com>
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
My understanding is that a space in lojban writing indicates an optional pause. That is, one must pause at a {.}, one may pause at a { }, and one must not pause at any other place. Therefore, a lojban passage written down with no spaces and only showing stress may be the most accurate way to describe that sentence as uttered in one instance, but it might be inaccurate with regard to another instance.
mi'e .sen.
Timothy Hobbs <tim.thelion@gmail.com> wrote: I think it is kind of interesting that in theory, if lojban is written down the same way it is spoken, which is what I always thought, that one might use no spaces, but still capitalise for stress. Then it really would be written down in the way that it was spoken, and that would be wonderful. As for those of you that find it difficult to read, I think that it could become,
with practice, much easier, because, you could, by looking at the shape of a sentence, and just a few letters, know what the sentence was, providing it didn't contain names.
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.