Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule

[Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru>]

On 13.11.2006, 23:12, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:08:42PM +0600, Yanis Batura wrote:
>> On 13.11.2006, 18:47, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote:
>> 
>> I would recommend a simple yet easy to learn solution that won't
>> distort the design of the language: saying {lua} for any
>> occurrence of {la} in cmene, {luai} for {lai} and {duoi} for
>> {doi}.

> That assumes people are capable of noticing the presence of those
> syllables, when clearly we're not.

Interesting. Will you generalize to the point that humans cannot
detect *any* given syllables in a stream of words they're just going
to pronounce, even after a training? Do you think there is a technical
limitation of human brains causing this?

Strange... As far as I know and judge from myself and others, human
brains can do much more difficult tasks in the realtime.

As an example, let's consider a game where players must in turns
say sentences, replacing all occurences of sound [i] with
sound, say, [u]. He who misses less [i]s, wins.

Do you think people won't get learned to play this game? Even if it
was for money?

mi'e .ianis