Re: [lojban] Re: ki'a

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

Arnt Richard Johansen wrote:
> This is exactly the way that stage-IV lujvo are being used today. I am 
> hard pressed to find *any* fu'ivla among the about two hundred currently 
> in Jbovlaste that do not fit any of the above categories.

I can think of one offhand: {vonpaso}, which is a kind of tcica, and is 
a fu'ivla in form, but not copied from another language. But you might 
say that it pertains to Nigerian culture.

phma