[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Paradoxes



2006/12/7, komfo,amonan <komfoamonan@gmail.com>:
On 12/6/06, Wang Xuerui <idontknw.wang@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, who knows paradoxes shorter than {la'e dei jitfa}?
>
> mi'e .ianis

If you're asking for something which has fewer syllables (the original one has 5), I'd say {danaduda}, 4 syllables.

Am I right?

I believe that {da na du da} is not a paradox, but simply false. mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan



Oh yes, shame on me. I think I should review my logic books again.

Then who'd be able to find a paradox that meets the original requirements?

--
Come and see http://community.livejournal.com/lojban/ -- The Lojban Community.

mi ma srera -- Anything wrong?

.imu'omi'e .uang. to mi na'e nelci la .uan. toi
Over, I'm Wang (I don't like Wan)