k i did some lojban translation. you have the original to reference if something doesn't make sense.da AKA a contradiction
The Russell's paradox has been around a long time. I really wonder why no one has noticed that "barber shop" example is a false analogy to the Universal Set. I won't get into the barbershop example as it would only distract from the logic but I do have a full thread
da na CMIma da .i ganai da CMIma da gi da du da
It is actually inconcievable that da is an Element of da. It is concievable that da is da. Though the contradiction is also true for a complete system it would still just be a reference to the same object -- sa'u da CMIma da du da.
ni'o ny du ro da poi RARna NAMcu
.i la'i .ny. du lu'i ro RARna'u gi
- now we have a set la'iby. du lu'i ny. ce vei ny. ve'o
- ge lu'ida CMIma la'iby. gi ta'o lu'ida nadu la'iby. .i ma'a JIMpe ledu'u da de DRAta zoi.gy. have a different number of elements as well as transfinite cardinality .gy. ta zoi .gy. Note the { } are necessary to add the piece of information distinguishing this as a set rather than an arbitrary list of unrelated numbers.gy.
- ge daduda giku'i da naCMIma da
ni'o ganai la'i da du lu'i da ce de gi daCMImada
.i ku'i ge la'i da nadu lu'i da gi da nadu da .ui.u'iLet f(x) be any formula of first order logic in which da is a free variable.
Definition. The collection la'i abu, denoted lu'i da zo'u da CMIma la'i abu .o f(x) , is the individual la'i abu satisfying lu'i roda zo'u da CMIma la'i .abu. .o f(x)
to which Russel says:
ni'o roda zo'u da CMIma da .o da naCMIma da
.idu da CMIma da .o da naCMIma da
to which one might say:
da du da .o da naCMIma da
da .o da naCMIma da
da naCMIma da is actually a fundamental truth. As is da CMIma da du da
So da naCMIma da can be subsititutied with JETnu
da .o JETnu
So as we already know that a contradiction can prove any concievable thing.
simple proof: roda can not be proved from a contradiction. roda can be proved from a contradiction.
Can't argue with that and it's not a circular argument. Multiplication begins! as now we have more than a single item. so wheras with a circle you have da and da, wheras with a contradiction you have da .i nada, which is something that is not da, so something else! Do you understand? Now we can increase the amount of things by adding as many nada's as we desire and renaming them de .a di .a LERfubu .a roda :D there you have it complete mathematical theory.
1/0
--
It should be noted that this email was generated by Your subconciousness. You should note that the email you get is the email you expect -- unless you expect an unexpected email.
Have a nice day! Be Happy! :D join la.ma'aSELTcan. for more information.
--
It should be noted that this email was generated by Your subconciousness. You should note that the email you get is the email you expect -- unless you expect an unexpected email.
Have a nice day! Be Happy! :D join la.ma'aSELTcan. for more information.
--
It should be noted that this email was generated by Your subconciousness. You should note that the email you get is the email you expect -- unless you expect an unexpected email.
Have a nice day! Be Happy! :D join la.ma'aSELTcan. for more information.
--
It should be noted that this email was generated by Your subconciousness. You should note that the email you get is the email you expect -- unless you expect an unexpected email.
Have a nice day! Be Happy! :D join la.ma'aSELTcan. for more information.