[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: type-3 fu'ivla and ndj rule



On 9/21/07, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> > A jamo, in Korean writing, is a phonemic character which is assembled into a
> > syllabic character. If I make a short-rafsi type-3 fu'ivla out of that, it
> > comes out {lerndjamo}, which is an ill-formed word.

By the way, WHY is this ill-formed? My vim lojban mode plugin
recognized this as a valid fu'ivla. But I have last time touched it
more than half year ago, and I don't remember details of the logic I
have implemented. If my plugin is wrong, I am to rewrite it, but is it
really wrong?

-- 
Cyril Slobin <slobin@ice.ru> `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said,
http://wagner.pp.ru/~slobin/ `it means just what I choose it to mean'
N������y��X��ǧvf����6ڞX��������z+��������˛��m��h�����������ʋ�z���\��������r��j���6ڞ���