[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] status of BPFK changes
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] status of BPFK changes
- From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:54:45 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=TfZhb/QwwmKuc28lXSI2+/2b0zIef579gU6u4MeFK1I=; b=qcnrydrBgFm3nsNbz9vpfPFTZaCFUfu9XT5CLgVuItF2jbBaMOb+ezdDktxAQoZ1N1CtoxM/WkxstJFK4IWxJl0EnfzvdfteJL/aS3s4viCJ67/BRPLkGjKohdrAlT+ilLpQzKl+z55M+eVa1t2HZWjYKWyQcBSBYNAxAc5ugGw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dq1iN/T1tQ+g3E14kODWcB4xTkBnL3IqE8dzRZTBLQWRw4ZAypUyNp9oxTndZXjEYjFhrVPUyihU8gzDXJgQrGQRvrA40vM17nAq9Ul+zWcqFv6ymgV7aM7FfEgvp1WdhCn1LJUZcFhGaW8igkgTl4OAZR2kxkEW/aUokDpDRP4=
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
There are many items in CLL that are contradicted by proposed BPFK
changes. I'm considering doing some of my own curriculum-type
material, and I'm wondering how I should handle these areas of
contention. Should I simply include the changes in the material while
noting their non-finalized status? Should I worry about things that
have/haven't been put to vote?
I'm leaning towards not describing the old meanings, but simply
putting a note about there having been BPFK changes.
Chris Capel
--
"What is it like to be a bat? What is it like to bat a bee? What is it
like to be a bee being batted? What is it like to be a batted bee?"
-- The Mind's I (Hofstadter, Dennet)
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.