[lojban] Re: tagged termsets

[Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com>]

de'i li 17 pi'e 12 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Michael Turniansky .fy. cusku zoi
skamyxatra.
> Totus asked about the following at the end of [Esther] chapter 3
...
> So, anyone willing to answer?  It came up again
.skamyxatra

This was already answered when you asked about this on the WikiDiscuss mailing
list two months ago.  Since I'm not sure how to link to that list's archives,
here are the responses that were given:

Jorge:
> "Tagged termsets" or "tagged-term sets"? The former are not grammatical.
>
> Anyway, "nu'u" makes no difference, it's an elidable terminator, and
> there are two of them, one for each termset:
>
> nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri [nu'u] gi tecu'u
> ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri [nu'u]

You replied:
> But why then does the CLL not mark the first nu'u as elidible in the
> example cited by Andrew?  I assumed that the scoping was somehow
> different between the two versions.

Jorge replied:
> I assume it's just a typo. In fact the first "nu'u" is more elidable
> than the second, because "gi" itself always shows the end of the first
> termset.

Do you still have any questions?

mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.

-- 
ko na xalni


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.