[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Place structure of bijyjbu
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: Place structure of bijyjbu
- From: Lindar Greenwood <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:49:40 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1262576980; bh=naF/APFAdFLkUUHkt4bqPHstyYJ2iK56aiiUHCRsk/g=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AONN94OcjxLNitZz3F5+BerxwcB3Q9nM9NnbwB6/hWjjUiDbI9VL5WlFcMIi6lUxn1hbzSfPtyOanDhwDfDMixs9Jzlff758NaR4M6EVz4VIgb2BliiM/zoP6aEP2l+LMol2yy+3G8uOmBwSPuTIJnWAsx0fEPRjvrJifMJtnew=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=z1H9N5YqfBjiTDCiOZmcqcGlVKGMETgtTLQlS78G7Xagtw6phhCQemKj/uxqmxpqEs3ZfdMVsGdpm/Hl1HRDUKkJkZVVizkX0pYo2X9Q0GwHskyth/AsW2TKZrP4w87SPTRXZF1lEKCXkjFRJlHmk8atRniT3Yz+KaTsAN0XN5Y=;
- In-reply-to: <12ee707c1001031857l193fbcf7l5107a5e3dd4e88c8@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <12ee707c1001031857l193fbcf7l5107a5e3dd4e88c8@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
>From: Geoff Hacker <geoff.hacker@gmail.com>
>To: lojban-list@lojban.org
>Sent: Sun, January 3, 2010 6:57:13 PM
>Subject: [lojban] Place structure of bijyjbu
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>I just looked up "desk" in the "current" version of the jvoste (it is "bijyjbu") and do not think that its place structure is very user-friendly:
>
>x1 = jubme1 (table), x2 = jubme2 (table material), x3 = jubme3 (leg), x4 = briju2 (office worker)
>
>If I talk about a desk in an office, I am really highly unlikely to be referring to it in the context of what material or legs it has. I am far more likely to be saying that it is so-and-so's desk, and maybe after that further details about the office in which the desk appears, so I would have thought a more logical place structure was:
>
>x1 = jubme1 (table), x2 = briju2 (office worker) x3 = briju1 (office) x4 = briju3 (office location) and then maybe x5 = jubme2 (table material - so I could say, e.g., that it is a bijyjbu be fu lo [mahogany].)
>
>What do people think, and how would the jvoste get changed if a different consensus were reached?
>
>Geoff
<scruffy>Second.</scruffy>
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.