On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 07:41:17AM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> Â Â Â> What about cmavo? ïJust take the definitions as they currently are
> Â Â Â> in the list?
>
> Â Â ÂStill open.
>
> Â ÂYou could do that, certainly. It'd be nice to have individual
> Â Âentries for each point on the scale for scalar cmavo (i.e.
> Â Â{.ui}, {.uicai}, {.uinai}, eic.), but I think that it'd be too
> Â Âcumbersome to do that,
Well, {.ui} and {.uinai} are in the list already. ÂThe sai/cai/ru'e
versions aren't, and that seems too many extra words to me.
> and learners more than likely could figure it out. In short, I
> think a striaght one to one transfer from the cmavo list would be
> fine.
Coo'.
> The only (big) question in my mind is, how to order them?
> Alphabetical is certainly not the way to do it, but both selma'o
> order and usage order have their points.
I don't see any advantage to selma'o order for flashcards at all;
usage order is best for people trying to memorize vocabulary.
Well, for flashcards, maybe not.