[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Use and abuse of sets
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
la adam cusku di'e
>Not that I know much about set theory, but wouldn't the place
>structure of the bridi for "mathematical set" have to be close to "x1
>is the set with members x2 (complete specification)".
The problem here is how do you give a complete specification
that is not the set itself. For example, ko'a ce ko'e is
the set with members ko'a and ko'e, that would go in x1.
ko'a e ko'e would not be right in x2, because you would
be claiming that each of them is the complete specification
of the membership. What would go in x2, a mass?
co'o mi'e xorxes
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 0.0%
Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/937/1/_/17627/_/952102498/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com