Le dimanche 5 novembre 2017 10:01:39 UTC, Benoit Neil a écrit :
coi do
I recently stumbled upon a document (le teris...) which was in declined in two versions: "
CLL Lojban" and "
modern Lojban". I don't understand why.
- What is the status of "modern Lojban"? Is it a kind of beta / pre-release / proposal? Or is there a schism / fork, were a group prefer one version over the other?
"Modern Lojban" is some versions of dialects that are used by some people who thinks their own dialects are the modern Lojban, and the others' dialects are not. Here is my "accusation" against the situation.
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/The_egocentrism_of_a_Lojban_community
As for the newer one among the texts of {teris}, however, not only their "modern Lojban" but also my dialect regards it as grammatical.
I don't call their dialects "beta" or "pre-release", but they are a group of proposals in any case. There is a schism of Lojban speakers according to preference of dialects, and I created a documentary film about it last year:
https://vimeo.com/190637628
- What are (in a few words) the differences between the two? Why choose one or another?
Some of the differences are already described in the documentary film above.
I choose neither their "modern Lojban" nor the CLL's, but mine, which I call "Zantufa", because I prefer it. I don't care what the others choose. Some people choose "modern Lojban", and some others persist in the CLL Lojban.
- Where is the reference documentation of "modern Lojban"?
Unfortunately, I don't find any comprehensive document about their "modern Lojban". As for my dialect, here is the one:
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/zantufa
je'e ui do
mi'e la guskant