[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: conflicts in grammar.235
- To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
- Subject: Re: conflicts in grammar.235
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 12:17:08 -0400
- In-reply-to: <199510251354.JAA23894@cs.columbia.edu> (message from Paulo Barreto on Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:13:00 LCL)
- Reply-to: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
>Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:13:00 LCL
>From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF%ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
>I checked grammar.235 with yacc and three shift-reduce errors were
>reported. No errors for grammar.28. I didn't check John's recent
>change proposal, but I don't think it addresses this problem.
>Is it a known problem? Could someone check it with his/hers local
>yacc version/clone? Mine tells the following (-V option):
I don't know that shift/reduce conflicts qualify as a "problem." They're
an ambiguity in the grammar, but yacc (and presumably lojban) generates an
unambiguous parse in these cases by resolving in favor of shifting instead
of reducing (I think). So I don't know if this is something that needs to
be "fixed," more just understood.
Or am I missing something?
~mark