Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Jim Carter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, R.M. Uittenbogaard
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Chris A Bogart
  • BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Jim Carter
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Jim Carter
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, R.M. Uittenbogaard
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, R.M. Uittenbogaard
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Nick Summers
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Chris A Bogart
  • Re: BEGINNER'S QUESTION: internal sumti, Chris A Bogart
• Re: Final warning about baseline, Clark Nelson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Final warning about baseline, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Final warning about baseline, Clark Nelson
  • Re: Final warning about baseline, Clark Nelson
• Re: CONLANG: Write-only language, part 2, Don Wiggins
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CONLANG: Write-only language, part 2, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: CONLANG: Write-only language, part 2, Logical Language Group
  • Re: CONLANG: Write-only language, part 2, Don Wiggins
  • Re: CONLANG: Write-only language, part 2, Don Wiggins
  • Re: CONLANG: Write-only language, part 2, Don Wiggins
  • Re: CONLANG: Write-only language, part 2, Don Wiggins
• Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Chris A Bogart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Seth Golub
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Steven Belknap
  • Lojban's imperfections?, Christian Richard
  • Lojban's imperfections?, Christian Richard
  • Lojban's imperfections?, Christian Richard
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Chris A Bogart
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Chris A Bogart
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Seth Golub
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Seth Golub
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Steven Belknap
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Steven Belknap
  • Lojban's imperfections?, Claudio Gnoli
  • Lojban's imperfections?, Claudio Gnoli
  • Lojban's imperfections?, Claudio Gnoli
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428
  • Re: Lojban's imperfections?, Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428
  • Lojban's imperfections?, Claudio Gnoli
  • Lojban's imperfections?, Claudio Gnoli
• Re: lojban imperfections?, John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Chris A Bogart
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Chris Double
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Graeme Dunbar
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, John E. Clifford
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, John E. Clifford
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Chris A Bogart
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Chris A Bogart
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Chris Double
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Chris Double
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Graeme Dunbar
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, Graeme Dunbar
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, And Rosta
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, And Rosta
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, And Rosta
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, And Rosta
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, And Rosta
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, And Rosta
  • Re: lojban imperfections?, John E. Clifford
• [no subject], Steven Belknap
• Re: lojban imperfections, John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lojban imperfections, John E. Clifford
  • Re: lojban imperfections, John E. Clifford
• [no subject], Logical Language Group
• PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Don Wiggins
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Mark E. Shoulson
  • PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Don Wiggins
  • PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Don Wiggins
  • Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Don Wiggins
  • Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech, And Rosta
  • Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Don Wiggins
  • Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech, Don Wiggins