Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: Color words (was: Re: comments on the batch of lujvo et, (continued)
  • Re: Color words (was: Re: comments on the batch of lujvo et, Colin Fine
  • Re: Color words (was: Re: comments on the batch of lujvo et, Chris Handley
• Re: logban ' <=> h, Simon Janes aka Guru Aleph-Null
• Re: lojban h, fschulz
• h vs ', Rob Brady
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: h vs ', Logical Language Group
  • Re: h vs ', Logical Language Group
• real life, Rob Brady
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • real life, Rob Brady
• Re: Color words (was: Re: comments on the batch of lujvo etc. psoted, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Color words (was: Re: comments on the batch of lujvo etc. psoted, Colin Fine
  • Re: Color words (was: Re: comments on the batch of lujvo etc. psoted, Logical Language Group
• Re: lojban ', Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lojban ', Colin Fine
  • Re: lojban ', John Cowan
  • Re: lojban ', John Cowan
  • Re: lojban ', Logical Language Group
• 'Letteral' (Was: comments on the batch of lujvo etc. psoted thus far), Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • 'Letteral' (Was: comments on the batch of lujvo etc. psoted thus far), Colin Fine
• Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Rob Brady
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Rob Brady
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Real Life, Colin Fine
• 'lerfu' glosses, C_Burke%SEMPERFI
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • 'lerfu' glosses, C_Burke%SEMPERFI
  • Re: 'lerfu' glosses, John Cowan
• TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too, bites the dust), Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too, bites the dust), Logical Language Group
• Re: Exons and Introns., Jim Flanagan
• Re: 'Letteral' (Was: comments on the batch of lujvo etc. psoted thus far), Logical Language Group
• Re: Lojban List, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lojban List, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lojban List, Erik Rauch
  • Re: Lojban List, Nick Nicholas
• significant Lojban news! (???), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • significant Lojban news! (???), Logical Language Group
  • Re: significant Lojban news! (???), Doug Merritt
  • Re: significant Lojban news! (???), John Cowan
  • Re: significant Lojban news! (???), John Cowan
• On the tense system, Jorge LLambias
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On the tense system, Logical Language Group
  • Re: On the tense system, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: On the tense system, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: On the tense system, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: On the tense system, Colin Fine
  • Re: On the tense system, Colin Fine
  • Re: On the tense system, Colin Fine
  • Re: On the tense system, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: On the tense system, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: On the tense system, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: On the tense system, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: On the tense system, Logical Language Group
  • Re: On the tense system, Logical Language Group
  • Re: On the tense system, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: On the tense system, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: On the tense system, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: On the tense system, Colin Fine
  • Re: On the tense system, John Cowan
• TECH : the many lujvo of lojban, Rob Brady
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH : the many lujvo of lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH : the many lujvo of lojban, Logical Language Group
• ZAhO tenses explained, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ZAhO tenses explained, bob
• Lujvo progress report, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Lujvo progress report, Nick Nicholas
• Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too,, Logical Language Group
• TECH: anniversary, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: anniversary, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: anniversary, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: anniversary, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: TECH: anniversary, Mr Andrew Rosta
• Passports, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Passports, John Cowan
• TECH: Instrumental vocabulary, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • TECH: Instrumental vocabulary, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: Instrumental vocabulary, VILVA
• Re: TECH: SE rafsi omitted in lujvo (was Re: dikyjvo, too, bites the dust, Mr Andrew Rosta
• TECH: query on zoi & laho terminators, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECH: query on zoi & laho terminators, Colin Fine
  • Re: TECH: query on zoi & laho terminators, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: TECH: query on zoi & laho terminators, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: TECH: query on zoi & laho terminators, John Cowan