Mail Thread Index

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Re: more on fat gismu, (continued)
- Re: more on fat gismu, ucleaar
- Re: more on fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
- Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
- Re: more on fat gismu, ucleaar
- Re: more on fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
- Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
- Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
- Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
- Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
- Re: more on fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Logical Language Group
- Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Colin Fine
- Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Iain Alexander
- Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Logical Language Group
- Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Nick Nicholas
TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Jorge LLambias
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Jorge LLambias
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
- TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Colin Fine
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Jorge LLambias
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
- Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Nick Nicholas
Lojban to TLI Loglan correspondences available on ftp, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Lojban to TLI Loglan correspondences available on ftp, Logical Language Group
TECH: muvdu place structure, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- TECH: muvdu place structure, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: muvdu place structure, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TECH: muvdu place structure, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: muvdu place structure, Iain Alexander
TECH: jarco place structure, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- TECH: jarco place structure, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: jarco place structure, Nick Nicholas
TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Jorge LLambias
- Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Logical Language Group
PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony, Logical Language Group
- Re: PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony, Jorge LLambias
- Re: PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony, Robert J. Chassell
TECH: deagentive place structures, ucleaar
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, Jorge LLambias
- Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, ucleaar
- Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, ucleaar
- Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, Jorge LLambias
news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view), Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view), Bruce Gilson
- Re: news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view), Logical Language Group
rely, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: rely, Bruce Gilson
- Re: rely, Jorge LLambias
- Re: rely, ucleaar
- Re: rely, Jorge LLambias
Re: Change of e-mail address, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Change of e-mail address, Logical Language Group
Intransitives, Colin Fine
Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Art Protin
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Art Protin
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Jorge Llambias
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Chris Handley
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Chris Handley
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Nick Nicholas
- Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Nick Nicholas
Some questions about the text, Glyn Gowing
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Some questions about the text, Logical Language Group
ADMIN: Charge cards, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ADMIN: Charge cards, Logical Language Group
- Re: ADMIN: Charge cards, ucleaar
ADMIN: New Lojban Parser Policy - Parser available on ftp, Logical Language Group
LEXICON: Programming jargon, Logical Language Group
TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, jimc
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Art Protin
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
- Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group

Mail converted by MHonArc