Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, (continued)
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
• "ro" doesn't imply +specific, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "ro" doesn't imply +specific, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, i . alexander . bra0125
  • Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, i . alexander . bra0125
  • Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, ucleaar
  • Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, ucleaar
• "le re loi tanxe", Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "le re loi tanxe", Logical Language Group
• Re: two typical men, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: two typical men, bob
• negation translation, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • negation translation, bob
    • Re: negation translation, Logical Language Group
    • Re: negation translation, Logical Language Group
• Re: re loi smani, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: re loi smani, bob
    • Re: re loi smani, Logical Language Group
  • Re: re loi smani, Logical Language Group
  • Re: re loi smani, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: re loi smani, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: re loi smani, Goran Topic
  • Re: re loi smani, Goran Topic
• Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
    • Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Logical Language Group
    • Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
• lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
• Ralph believes someone is a spy, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Ralph believes someone is a spy, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Ralph believes someone is a spy, bob
  • Re: Ralph believes someone is a spy, bob
• PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Chris Bogart
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Nick Legend Nicholas
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
    • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Chris Bogart
    • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
    • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Nick Legend Nicholas
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
• size of breeds, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • size of breeds, bob
• small universe consequences, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • small universe consequences, bob
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, bob
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, bob
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, bob
  • Re: small universe consequences, bob
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
    • Re: small universe consequences, Logical Language Group
    • Re: small universe consequences, Logical Language Group
• quick comment on {loi}, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • quick comment on {loi}, bob
  • Re: quick comment on {loi}, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: quick comment on {loi}, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: quick comment on {loi}, bob