Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: Rafsi Repair Proposal: 1
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: Chinese whispers
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Chinese whispers
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• response to Dylan on rafsi
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: cowan
• pointing
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: cowan
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: cowan
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: cowan
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• TECH: missing part of morphology paper
  • From: cowan
• TECH: missing part of morphology paper
  • From: cowan
• TECH: missing part of morphology paper
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• response to Dylan on rafsi
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• pointing
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• TECH: missing part of morphology paper
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: pointing
  • From: "Peter L. Schuerman" <plschuerman@UCDAVIS.EDU>
• Re; Good Clarifying Question
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Iain Alexander <ia@STRYX.DEMON.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Iain Alexander <ia@STRYX.DEMON.CO.UK>
• Re: Rafsi Repair Proposal: 1
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: Chinese whispers
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Chinese whispers
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: pointing
  • From: "Peter L. Schuerman" <plschuerman@UCDAVIS.EDU>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Iain Alexander <ia@stryx.demon.co.uk>
• Re: Rafsi Repair Proposal: 1
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Iain Alexander <ia@stryx.demon.co.uk>
• Re; Good Clarifying Question
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• De-Proposition
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• De-Proposition
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• sci-fi & lojban
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• sci-fi & lojban
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: cowan
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: cowan
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: sci-fi & lojban
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: sci-fi & lojban
  • From: cowan
• Re: sci-fi & lojban
  • From: cowan
• Re: sci-fi & lojban
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Order of papers in reference grammar
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Order of papers in reference grammar
  • From: cowan
• Order of papers in reference grammar
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Order of papers in reference grammar
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: xruti
  • From: John Cowan <cowanj@RITZ.MORDOR.COM>
• Re: xruti
  • From: John Cowan <cowanj@RITZ.MORDOR.COM>
• rafsi for "jai" should be "jax-"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• jboste sorcu
  • From: Dylan Thurston <dpt@MATH.BERKELEY.EDU>
• rafsi for "jai" should be "jax-"
  • From: cowan
• rafsi for "jai" should be "jax-"
  • From: cowan
• rafsi for "jai" should be "jax-"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• jboste sorcu
  • From: Dylan Thurston <dpt@MATH.BERKELEY.EDU>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• lujvo query
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• lujvo query
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: jboste sorcu
  • From: Dylan Thurston <dpt@MATH.BERKELEY.EDU>
• Re: jboste sorcu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• comments from G Burgess on phonology paper
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: jboste sorcu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: I've received a spam thru this list , what can be done
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: jboste sorcu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: De-Proposition
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>