Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: Cowan denounces "je'a xi <number>"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: except, etc.
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• CHANGE PROPOSAL: terki restitution
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• tanru gerna srera
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: "except" found?
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• {ti} (was: Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals)
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• html and lojban
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
• Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
• Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• xelfanva and comments
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
• Re: CONLANG: Novial
  • From: brg@NETCOM.COM (Bruce R. Gilson)
• Re: open Lojban issues
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@crl.com>
• Re: {ti} (was: Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• intemperate response to Lojbab on situation types
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• short intemperate response to Lojbab on {duu}
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• short response to Lojbab on {jai}
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• short intemperate response to Lojbab on opacity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: "except" found?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• very intemperate response to Lojbab on Fifafuban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• short response to Lojbab on discursives
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• short intemperate response to Lojbab on {kea}
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• short intemperate response to Lojbab on aspectuals' syntax
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: intemperate response to Lojbab on situational types
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: terki restitution
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: {ti} (was: Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals)
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: short intemperate response to Lojbab on {kea}
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• xelfanva and comments
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• delayed response on YACC LR(k) discussion - from Jeff Prothero
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: short intemperate response to Lojbab on {duu}
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: xelfanva and comments
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: intemperate response to Lojbab on situational types
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• fuzzy: use of <ni>, use of <jei>, need for <xoi>
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• ADM: The Experimental Lojban List Database
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
• ADM: Test database of Lojban List postings
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
• Re: short intemperate response to Lojbab on {kea}
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar%ucl.ac.uk@UKACRL.BITNET>
• Re: short response to Lojbab on {jai}
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• ADM: Searchable Lojban List Archive on-line
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
• Re: xelfanva and comments
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: fuzzy: use of <ni>, use of <jei>, need for <xoi>
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• kamkuspe
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: xelfanva and comments
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• [no subject]
  • From: -
• Re: fuzzy: use of <ni>, use of <jei>, need for <xoi>
  • From: sbelknap@uic.edu (Steven M. Belknap)
• searchable lojban list archive
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Cognitive distortions and lojban
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: kamkuspe
  • From: "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
• Tech: fuzzy: kamkuspe
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: searchable lojban list archive
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
• Re: Cultural neutrality
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: fuzzy: use of <ni>, use of <jei>, need for <xoi>
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Cognitive distortions into Lojban
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: Cognitive distortions and lojban
  • From: "Peter L. Schuerman" <plschuerman@UCDAVIS.EDU>
• Re: Tech: fuzzy: kamkuspe
  • From: "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
• Re: Tech: fuzzy: kamkuspe
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: JBO: xelfanva and comments
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: Cognitive distortions and lojban
  • From: "Peter L. Schuerman" <plschuerman@UCDAVIS.EDU>
• fiui
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: xelfanva and comments
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• TECH: fuzzy: <xoi> vs. <fihuhi>
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy: <xoi> vs. <fihuhi>
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• bnf and yacc
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy: <xoi> vs. <fihuhi>
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy: <xoi> vs. <fihuhi>
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: bnf and yacc
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: bnf and yacc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy: <xoi> vs. <fihuhi>
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• TECH: fuzzy
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Broken Phone #2
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Broken Phone #2
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• New version of papers released
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• New version of papers released
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• fuzzy lojban
  • From: sbelknap@uic.edu (Steven M. Belknap)
• Re: TECH: fuzzy
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: fuzzy lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: fuzzy lojban
  • From: sbelknap@uic.edu (Steven M. Belknap)
• Comments on nobody.txt
  • From: "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Comments on nobody.txt
  • From: "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
• My acknowledgements in the reference grammar
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• fuzzy lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• My acknowledgements in the reference grammar
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• intensional sets of bridi
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i
  • From: Unknown
• TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i
  • From: cowan
• TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i
  • From: cowan
• TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i
  • From: Unknown
• TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i
  • From: cowan
• TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i
  • From: Unknown