Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

["John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

And here we see why we need to show how are bunches connect with predicates. Lo blabi gerku is a klesi at best collectively (and even that may be a type mistake) and is gerku only conjunctively.  Lo klesi be lo gerku is conjunctively klesi, not gerku.  That aside, I agree that various quantifiers, descriptors or abstractors don't do much to solve problems about {lo} (though I don't think there are problems about {lo} per se).  And {zo'e} must mean what I want it to mean or would want if I thought about.

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 21, 2011, at 18:08, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> da
>> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.