[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:07 AM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
> There is an
> intermediate position (Dave Kaplan's? I think I got it from him or maybe Monty
> Furth): that the individuals, even in the depository of entities, come with some
> characteristics (haeceity) but not others. Of course, what is in that haeceity
> is still to be resolved. So, I am human everywhere and probably introverted and
> pessimistic, but the rest is up for grabs.
But then how do you give a meaningful answer to "if you were an
animal, what animal would you be?"
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.